Verb Agreement None

You will find additional help for the agreement between themes in the Pluriurale section. We do not use a place where we think no one or no one: yes, we can use either a singular or a plural verb based on context, based on what seems more or clearer. As far as we know, the SAT`s test service has not changed its position on the word “no singular.” Thank you for sharing your logical argument. Today, however, most sources accept the use of none of a singular or plural meaning. The choice of verb now depends on the context. I think this issue is a place where the difference between the American and British versions of English has upset the water. The British use a plural verb with a noun meaning a pluralist. For example, the team, the committee and the class are all words that the Americans consider singular (a team), while the British consider a team to be composed of many players and therefore as an additional word. We write: “The team played at home” as they write, “The team played at home.” Their arguments in favor of the absence of use in the plural, when they refer to a plural entity, resemble exactly this logic of “the team were… ” — it sounds weird to a lot of American ears, but it`s considered quite right in some English-speaking places. Note: Apparently, the sat test service does not consider any of them to be a single word. However, according to Merriam Webster Dictionary of English Usage, “Clearly no singular and plural since the old and still is. The idea that it is unique is a myth of unknown origin that seems to have emerged in the 19th century.

If this appears to you as a singular in the context, use a singular verb; If it appears as a plural, use a plural verb. Both are acceptable, beyond serious criticism” (p. 664) The AP-Stylebook also calls for journalists to use singular verbs with “none”; For the same reasons that Cassie just mentioned. It`s a “step one” contraction. This is another reason why writers need to know their audience when they write. The word is not a perfect substitute for anyone. The two do not mean “none; not one or the other. The word “person” can have the meaning of “anything” and is not limited to the choice of “one or the other.” That`s why they say, “The word “no words” is versatile. I think one of the reasons some people insist that “none” is always unique is the idea that it involves the idea of “not one”. Party words are tricky. They are not in themselves singular or plural and therefore most people have difficulty determining whether they want to use a singular or plural adverb.